“Adverbicide” to be Published by The Woven Tale Press

I’m pleased to announce that my craft article “Adverbicide: Must Writers Eradicate Adverbs?” will be published on The Woven Tale Press website. Here is the log line: “Adverbicide: Must Writers Eradicate Adverbs?” challenges anti-adverb dicta by critiquing their roots and drawing on developmental psychology to help writers overcome prohibitions and inhibitions. The editors expect the article to generate a lively debate. I’ll post the link when the essay is published. Leave your comments on The Woven Tale Press website and here on my blog. Read more about my thoughts on writing in REFLECTIONS.

The Woven Tale Press is the premier online hub for literature and visual arts

A Writer’s Obligation: Interest More Than Yourself

“For me, writing is really just learning about the things that interest me, and then trying to convince you to find them as interesting as I do.” — Susan Orlean on Twitter

Whether you write nonfiction (like the marvelous Susan Orlean) or fiction, the maxim applies. Good nonfiction writers engage readers in subjects they never thought they’d care about. Fiction writers, especially those who do extensive background research, are equally responsible for incorporating what they learn in ways that are integral to their stories. If we fail to generate that interest, the manuscript will be of interest to only one person — the writer. For more of my literary thoughts, see REFLECTIONS.

Nonfiction writer Susan Orlean can make any subject interesting

Literary Thoughts: Why Nighttime Driving is Like Writing

The late and revered author E. L. Doctorow said of nighttime driving, “You can see only as far as the headlights, but you can make the whole trip that way.” Doctorow could just as well have been talking about writing. You can only see as far as the next word or sentence, but guided by the headlights of imagination, you can write a whole book. For more of my thoughts on writing, see REFLECTIONS.

Nighttime driving is like writing. Yard by yard, word by word, guided by the headlights of imagination, you get there.
E. L. Doctorow

Is Writing a Vice?

From an interview with historian and writer Jill Lepore: “The Academy Is Largely Itself Responsible for Its Own Peril: Jill Lepore on writing the story of America, the rise and fall of the fact, and how women’s intellectual authority is undermined” by Evan Goldstein (Chronicle of Higher Education, November 13, 2018):

Q. You get asked about your productivity a lot. I gather it’s a question you don’t like.

A. I sometimes say to people — this is like a 1930s thing to say, you can picture Barbara Stanwyck saying it in a noir film — it’s like complimenting a girl on her personality. It’s not about “You do good work,” it’s about “You do a lot of work.” // For a lot of people writing is an agony; it’s a part of what we do as scholars that they least enjoy. For me writing is a complete and total joy, and if I’m not writing I’m miserable. I have always written a lot. For years, before I wrote for The New Yorker, I wrote an op-ed every day as practice and shoved it in a drawer. It’s not about being published, it’s about the desire to constantly be writing. It’s such a strongly felt need that if it was something socially maladaptive it would be considered a vice.

I’m with her. Read Lepore’s latest book, These Truths. For more of my thoughts on writing see REFLECTIONS.

Mapping or Meandering?

Barbara Kingsolver and Richard Powers recently had a conversation about the craft of writing (see “A Talk in the Woods” by Kevin Larimer, Poets & Writers, November/December 2018, pp. 46-55). I resonated with Kingsolver’s description of her creative process as it bears many similarities to how I work. For example, she says “I do a lot of architecture. I do an enormous amount of planning. … [Others] say ‘Well I just start writing and I don’t have any idea where I’m going to end up, and it’s like a wander through the woods.’” Like Kingsolver, I’m a “mapper” rather than a “meanderer” (my terms). Not that I don’t change direction or take detours as the story evolves, but before I can start to write I like to identify a final (albeit draft) destination and set out markers along the way. For more thoughts on the observations of these noted authors, see REFLECTIONS.

Thank You, Jerry Seinfeld

Now I understand why I roll up a weaving and put it in a trunk when it is finished, and I don’t like to reread a story or novel once it’s completed. Interviewer: When you’re flipping channels and you come across a “Seinfeld” rerun, do you flip right past it or do you linger? Seinfeld: Right past. I think there’s a level of focus you need to get something to a certain point creatively, and you pay a price for that, which is you can’t ever look at it again. (From “Jerry Seinfeld Says Jokes Are Not Real Life” Interview by Dan Amira, The New York Times Magazine, 08/19/18, p. 58). For more thoughts on writing, see REFLECTIONS).

 

 

Write What You Learn, Not What You Already Know

My counter-argument to “Write what you know” has always been “Get to know what you want to write about.” The inspiration for my fiction often comes from something I learn by chance. Then I research the topic with intention and shape what I’ve learned into a work of fiction, prioritizing the story over the facts. In an e-doc compilation of author’s views on the role of research in writing (Glimmer Train, Close-Up: Research, 2nd edition), I came across the following: “Some people say that you should write what you know, but I am driven to write what I learn” (Abbi Geni, p. 7). Read more comments on this topic by Colum McCann, Duri Justvedt, and Ha Jin in REFLECTIONS.

Actor and Writer: Convince Thyself

(SPOILER ALERT) The solution to the New York Times acrostic puzzle on April 05, 2018 is: Stella Adler, The Art of Acting, “The reality you create on the stage by opening a jar or threading a needle isn’t so that the audience will believe in you. It’s so that you believe in yourself. Acting is truthful when you yourself are convinced.” Adler’s analysis applies equally well to writing. That is, the reality you create on the page with character, setting, and plot isn’t so that the reader will believe in your narrative but rather that you, the writer, convince yourself. For more thoughts on the art and craft of writing, see REFLECTIONS.

Stone by Stone and Word by Word

Like the mason builds a cathedral one stone at a time, so too the writer builds a book one word at a time. Admittedly, this thought is not original (read Anne Lamott’s classic manual Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life) but it encourages the novelist to aim for a magnificent literary edifice. For more thoughts on the art and craft of writing, see REFLECTIONS.

The Eight “Tudes” of Writing

In an interview, a lighting designer described three “tudes” necessary for the job: attitude, aptitude, fortitude. I added five more for the eight tudes essential to being a writer. In alphabetical order (they are of equal importance, albeit at different stages of the creative process): Attitude (thinking of yourself as a writer) // Aptitude (knowing your craft) // Beatitude (the blessing of a creative mind) // Certitude (confidence in the worth of your idea) // Exactitude (seeking the precise word or phrase) // Fortitude (butt-to-the-chair persistence in the face of rejection) // Gratitude (for the gift of writing in your life) // Latitude (to write “shitty first [or more] drafts”). (See REFLECTIONS for more thoughts about writing.)